Keep this fact in mind folks, the following information was put into motion by an executive order by President G. H. W. Bush in 1992. Congress did not vote on it. No bills were signed.
Before these two current bills were passed, I suppose there was a disproportionate amount of environmental injustice: that tornadoes, hurricanes and earthquakes and extreme weather patterns affected the minorities more than any other (specifically white Anglo-Saxon) groups.
HR 1103 Environmental Justice Act of 2007
HR 5132 was sponsored by Hilda Solis (Ca), Barney Frank (MA), Alcee Hastings (FL) and Albert Wynn (MD). All democrats.
The term `environmental justice’ means the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all individuals regardless of race, color, national origin, educational level, or income with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws (including regulations) to ensure that–
(A) minority and low-income populations have access to public information relating to human health and environmental planning, regulations, and enforcement; and
(B) no minority or low-income population shall be exposed to a disproportionate burden of the negative human health and environmental impacts of pollution or other environmental hazards.
What are these people thinking? What are their motives? Well it seems that this term has been around for some time now, since 1991 when the First National People of Color Environmental Leadership Summit held a meeting and adopted 17 principles of Environmental Justice.
1) Environmental Justice “affirms the sacredness of Mother Earth, ecological unity and the interdependence of all species, and the right to be free from ecological destruction.”
It demands, mandates, and “calls for universal protection from nuclear testing, extraction, production and disposal of toxic/hazardous wastes and poisons and nuclear testing that threaten the fundamental right to clean air, land, water, and food.”
It “demands the cessation of the production of all toxins, hazardous wastes, and radioactive materials.”
10) Environmental Justice considers governmental acts of environmental injustice a violation of international law, the Universal Declaration On Human Rights, and the United Nations Convention on Genocide.
15) Environmental Justice opposes military occupation, repression and exploitation of lands, peoples and cultures, and other life forms.
There it is: The chances that the US ever goes back to creating nuclear power plants to help us overcome our addiction to and dependency on foreign oil are slim to nada.
There it is: The US is on the way to subjugating our own laws to that of the UN.
There it is: The US is well on it’s way to a military that would not defend itself.
The EPA has had an Office of Environmental Justice since 1992, created under the first Bush. How naive I am. At first I was thinking that this was a brand new term created to insure that the current oil crisis and the global warming alarmism would insure that these calamities would not hit the minorities the hardest. But this is a full blown campaign already in motion for 15 years. It’ll be very improbable to stop this train.
Under the presidential order of George H W Bush: “Each Federal agency shale make acheiving environmental justice part of its mission by identifying and addressing as apprpriate, disproportionately high and advers human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income populations.” Misspells are theirs.
Wake up folks, the US and that includes every person in this country is under the control of the EPA, their mandates, regulations and policies, and I fear congress does not have the gumption to do anything about it. Bureaucrats calling the shots. Obama will not and McCain is suspect because of his desire to have a “comprehensive” plan dealing with energy. What has happened to constitutional thinking?
The availability of US oil is a problem created by congress and we the people are paying the price for their previous actions and current inactions.
What can we do? Nada. The efforts of Newt Gingrich are commendable, but will have little effect on closed minds. The current crop of republicans do not have the muscle to stop this train wreck.
The possibility of new nuclear power plants is a Congressional what if fear mongering subjugation to the EPA. The subject is closed. And again, we the people are paying the price for their inaction, because of their blind obedience to the environmentalists and people of color.
And don’t expect the media giants to turn and investigate their comrades as the media desires the same as our current leaders in congress. Submit to international bodies in the name of justice.
Sad.