Jan 24 2012
Birth control for everyone whether needed, wanted or not.
Ah, the abortion debate will not go away. Monday, thousands marched on Washington for Life. Monday, Obama and team announced that medical insurers must cover birth control measures. Across the country one is either for it or against it. Single unwed mothers are for it and Babies are against it. Planned parenthood is for it of course, because that’s where they get most of their money. . . . from the feds. Hmm, taxpayers. Obama himself said that women have a “fundamental constitutional right” to abortion and to “continue our efforts to ensure that our daughters have the same rights, freedoms, and opportunities as our sons to fulfill their dreams.” Secular humanists say the blob inside is just a bunch of matter. Christians know that life begins when the two cells come together and begin the life forming process. Politicians care where their biggest support in votes and cash comes from.
The country is hurting. The economy is on a drag. Businesses are not expanding. Prices are rising. People are fearful. Congress is at its lowest ever rating. The debt is climbing. Our energy needs are politically shambled. We’re in a war for freedom.
And this is what Washington pushes through. Mandating abortion freedom! Free to the one desiring to abort a life. No co-payment required, just sign on the dotted line and you’ll be out of here in a few minutes free to exercise your whatever. You and I will pick up the bill. The taxpayers will pick up the bill.
That also means that hospitals must also perform birth control procedures even if the procedure violates their religious principles. Those will have one year and a few months to get in line with the rest of the country. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said “I believe this proposal strikes the appropriate balance between respecting religious freedom and increasing access to important preventive services.”
Just like Bill Clinton when he debated the definition of “is”.
Respect: To feel or show deferential regard for; esteem. To avoid violation of or interference with. To relate or refer to; concern.
We the people could use a little bit of respect by the big wigs in Washington. Most of us normal rational civil people across the fruited plains show respect for our neighbors by not interfering in their lives, respecting their property and personal business and expecting the same in return. Do we care if the next door neighbor has an abortion? Possibly, but they must deal with it and so we stay out of it. It’s their decision. It does not affect me and mine. But if that same neighbor demanded that I help pay for that procedure, then forget it, I will not. I’ll fight it.