The Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association owns some prime beach front property in New Jersey, whose mission “is to provide opportunities for spiritual birth, growth and renewal through worship, education, cultural and recreational programs for persons of all ages in a Christian seaside setting.” One of the many opportunities for Christian fellowship and learning is in a chapel that is used for weddings, a boardwalk pavilion that is used for worship services etc., of it on land owned by the privately funded Association. To obtain permission to use of the facility, an application must be submitted and approved. On the application there are the customary disclaimers along with the following statement: “These facilities are available for usage that is consistent with our commitment to the United Methodist Church Book of Discipline. www.umc.org”
However, none of that was taken into account by the two women who made a deposit for the use of the church boardwalk pavilion for their wedding. Nope these ladies tried to sneak one by the association, and almost did. The association found out that this was a wedding of two lesbians and returned the deposit and gently denied them the use of the pavilion.
But then the ladies had another item up their blouse sleeve.
They sued.
They won.
“That didn’t make any difference to the New Jersey Division of Civil Rights,” says Staver of the group that issued its determination on Monday. “They said there’s no First Amendment defense here and in fact the church violated the public accommodation law in New Jersey,” the attorney notes. “After New Jersey adopted the same-sex civil union law, no longer could the church allow its facility to be used in ministry to the public because to do so would open them up to these same-sex civil unions.” More . . .
Crazy courts and judges. Here the court is telling a privately owned religious group what they can and cannot do on their own property.
Because they open the services for the public to attend, then they must also allow same sex marriages. So, to take this to any step down the path, any church in New Jersey would open themselves to same sex marriage within the church, if it opens it’s Sunday morning services to the public. If I’m reading this right, then the churches would have to have someone at the doors checking membership badges of everyone wishing to attend the service. Members only.
In effect the court is shutting down the mission of the church to reach out to all, to everyone and anyone, to those in need, to those seeking spiritual help and guidance, to those seeking salvation, to those seeking forgiveness, to those wanting to make things right with God, to those wishing to visit churches before making a decision to join etc.
The court has violated the constitution of the United States.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”
Could the court come back and say congress did not make the ruling, the state made the law about civil unions and the court is upholding the will of the state? States rights?
In this mixed up age of relativism, anything can happen.